Scientific Library of Tomsk State University

   E-catalog        

Normal view MARC view

Analysis of carrier species in arsenic-implanted p- and n-type Hg0.7Cd0.3Te I. I. Izhnin, K. D. Mynbaev, A. V. Voitsekhovskii [et al.]

Contributor(s): Izhnin, Igor I | Mynbaev, Karim D | Voytsekhovskiy, Alexander V | Korotaev, Alexander G | Varavin, Vasilii S | Dvoretsky, Sergei A | Mikhailov, Nikolay N | Yakushev, Maxim V | Fitsych, Olena I | Świątek, Zbigniew | Izhnin, Igor IMaterial type: ArticleArticleContent type: Текст Media type: электронный Subject(s): имплантация мышьяка | ионная имплантация | молекулярно-лучевая эпитаксия | эпитаксиальные пленкиGenre/Form: статьи в журналах Online resources: Click here to access online In: Infrared physics and technology Vol. 114. P. 103665 (1-7)Abstract: Carrier species in arsenic-implanted p– and n–type Hg0.7Cd0.3Te films grown by molecular-beam epitaxy were investigated with the use of the Hall-effect studies and mobility spectrum analysis. The implantation was performed with ion energy 190 or 350 keV and ion fluence ranging from 1012 to 1015 cm2. A substantial difference between carrier species in Hg0.7Cd0.3Te and Hg0.8Cd0.2Te films subjected to arsenic implantation and post- implantation activation annealing was established. In particular, arsenic implantation in p–type Hg0.7Cd0.3Te in most cases lead to the formation of n+–p– (not n+–n–p–) structures, and in n–type Hg0.7Cd0.3Te films post- implantation activation annealing lead to modification of the electrical parameters of the n–type ‘base’, in contrast to Hg0.8Cd0.2Te material studied earlier. The difference in carrier species formed in arsenic-implanted Hg0.7Cd0.3Te and Hg0.8Cd0.2Te films was tentatively explained by different background impurity concentrations in the films with different chemical composition.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Библиогр.: 18 назв.

Carrier species in arsenic-implanted p– and n–type Hg0.7Cd0.3Te films grown by molecular-beam epitaxy were investigated with the use of the Hall-effect studies and mobility spectrum analysis. The implantation was performed with ion energy 190 or 350 keV and ion fluence ranging from 1012 to 1015 cm2. A substantial difference between carrier species in Hg0.7Cd0.3Te and Hg0.8Cd0.2Te films subjected to arsenic implantation and post- implantation activation annealing was established. In particular, arsenic implantation in p–type Hg0.7Cd0.3Te in most cases lead to the formation of n+–p– (not n+–n–p–) structures, and in n–type Hg0.7Cd0.3Te films post- implantation activation annealing lead to modification of the electrical parameters of the n–type ‘base’, in contrast to Hg0.8Cd0.2Te material studied earlier. The difference in carrier species formed in arsenic-implanted Hg0.7Cd0.3Te and Hg0.8Cd0.2Te films was tentatively explained by different background impurity concentrations in the films with different chemical composition.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share