000 | 02109cam a2200385 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | koha001008183 | ||
005 | 20231121151937.0 | ||
008 | 110729s2012 enka b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2011032500 | ||
016 | 7 |
_a015986193 _2Uk |
|
020 | _a9780521747486 | ||
020 | _a0521747481 | ||
035 | _akoha001008183 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _cDLC _dYDX _dUKMGB _dYDXCP _dCDX _dBWX _dPUL _dSTF _dDLC _dRU-ToGU |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aP325 _b.W479 2012 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a401/.43 _223 |
084 |
_2rubbk _aШ100 |
||
100 | 1 |
_aWilson, Deirdre _9898905 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMeaning and relevance _cDeirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber |
260 |
_aCambridge [a. o.] _bCambridge University Press _c2012 _9702421 |
||
300 |
_aXIV, 382 p. _bill. |
||
336 | _aТекст | ||
337 | _aнепосредственный | ||
504 | _aBibliogr.: p. 350-372 | ||
504 | _aIndex: p. 373-382 | ||
520 | _a"When people speak, their words never fully encode what they mean, and the context is always compatible with a variety of interpretations. How can comprehension ever be achieved? Wilson and Sperber argue that comprehension is a process of inference guided by precise xpectations of relevance. What are the relations between the linguistically encoded meanings studied in semantics and the thoughts that humans are capable of entertaining and conveying? How should we analyse literal meaning, approximations, metaphors and ironies? Is the ability to understand speakers' meanings rooted in a more general human ability to understand other minds? How do these abilities interact in evolution and in cognitive development? Meaning and Relevance sets out to answer these and other questions, enriching and updating relevance theory and exploring its implications for linguistics, philosophy, cognitive science and literary studies"-- | ||
653 | _aлингвистика | ||
653 | _aкоммуникация | ||
653 | _aфилософия языка | ||
653 | _aлингвистическая прагматика | ||
700 | 1 |
_aSperber, Dan _9898906 |
|
852 | 4 |
_aRU-ToGU _nru _h401.43 _iWIL |
|
039 | _b106 | ||
999 | _c1008183 |