Scientific Library of Tomsk State University

   E-catalog        

Normal view MARC view

Сryptic species of Anopheles messeae sensu lato (Diptera: Culicidae), their identification, features and nomenclature Y. M. Novikov, A. I. Shevchenko

By: Novikov, Yuri MContributor(s): Shevchenko, Alexander IMaterial type: ArticleArticleContent type: Текст Media type: электронный Subject(s): анофелесы | полиморфизмGenre/Form: статьи в журналах Online resources: Click here to access online In: Вестник Томского государственного университета. Биология № 51. С. 69-85Abstract: The paper describes the change in perspective in the composition of the A. messeae taxonomic unit. Initially, based on the disequilibrium of natural populations, the species was differentiated into A and B forms using chromosomal inversions as markers. The positive assortative mating, as well as the ecological features and geographical distribution of these forms, made it possible to give them the status of species in statu nascendi. Later, we additionally investigated the EcoRI restriction fragments of the genomic DNA and the ITS2 nucleotide sequences in the A and B A. messeae species. Unambiguous differences between the species in the former marker and semi-quantitative differences in the latter one, alongside with the absence of hybrids in the populations studied, led us to conclude that A. messeae s.l. is comprised of two homosequential cryptic species with parallel chromosomal polymorphisms. Unequivocal parallels between A. lewisi Ludlow, 1920 and A. messeae B in regards to their features, as well as the identity of A. daciae Linton et al., 2004 to A. messeae A in its ITS2 sequence, and to A. messeae Fall. in diagnostic chromosomal inversions, allowed us to consider A. lewisi Ludlow, 1920 and A. messeae B as two names of the same biological species, and A. messeae Fall., 1926, A. messeae A, and A. daciae Linton et al., 2004 as three names of the other one. Both are members of the palaearctic group of the Maculipennis complex under the names Anopheles (Ano.) lewisi Ludlow, 1920 and Anopheles (Ano.) messeae Falleroni, 1926, respectively.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Библиогр.: 42 назв.

The paper describes the change in perspective in the composition of the A. messeae taxonomic unit. Initially, based on the disequilibrium of natural populations, the species was differentiated into A and B forms using chromosomal inversions as markers. The positive assortative mating, as well as the ecological features and geographical distribution of these forms, made it possible to give them the status of species in statu nascendi. Later, we additionally investigated the EcoRI restriction fragments of the genomic DNA and the ITS2 nucleotide sequences in the A and B A. messeae species. Unambiguous differences between the species in the former marker and semi-quantitative differences in the latter one, alongside with the absence of hybrids in the populations studied, led us to conclude that A. messeae s.l. is comprised of two homosequential cryptic species with parallel chromosomal polymorphisms. Unequivocal parallels between A. lewisi Ludlow, 1920 and A. messeae B in regards to their features, as well as the identity of A. daciae Linton et al., 2004 to A. messeae A in its ITS2 sequence, and to A. messeae Fall. in diagnostic chromosomal inversions, allowed us to consider A. lewisi Ludlow, 1920 and A. messeae B as two names of the same biological species, and A. messeae Fall., 1926, A. messeae A, and A. daciae Linton et al., 2004 as three names of the other one. Both are members of the palaearctic group of the Maculipennis complex under the names Anopheles (Ano.) lewisi Ludlow, 1920 and Anopheles (Ano.) messeae Falleroni, 1926, respectively.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share