‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers D. Nicholas, C. Boukacem-Zeghmouri, B. Rodriguez-Bravo [et al.]
Material type:
ArticleContent type: Текст Media type: электронный Subject(s): научное общение | молодые ученые | доступ к научной информации | пандемииGenre/Form: статьи в журналах Online resources: Click here to access online
In:
Learned publishing Vol. 36, № 2. P. 319-322Abstract: 170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified. The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good. The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.
Библиогр.: с. 322
170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified. The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good. The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking.
There are no comments on this title.