Scientific Library of Tomsk State University

   E-catalog        

Normal view MARC view

Prosecution for violations of International Humanitarian Law: Russia’s position L. V. Deriglazova, O. Yu. Smolenchuk

By: Deriglazova, Larisa VContributor(s): Smolenchuk, Olga YuMaterial type: ArticleArticleContent type: Текст Media type: электронный Subject(s): Россия | международное гуманитарное право | Международный уголовный трибунал по бывшей Югославии | международные преступления | Международный уголовный судGenre/Form: статьи в журналах Online resources: Click here to access online In: Russia in global affairs Vol. 19, № 4. P. 198-225Abstract: Russia’s official position regarding the prosecution for violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in international criminal courts changed during the 1990s and the 2000s. The article studies the reasons for these changes by reviewing works of Russian experts. The performance of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) had a negative impact on Russia’s position. Russian experts questioned the impartiality of the ICTY and its effectiveness in preventing such crimes and reconciling the parties. Russia’s position has also changed with regard to the International Criminal Court (ICC). In 2000, the Russian Federation signed the Rome Statute that established the ICC, but withdrew its signature in November 2016. One of the reasons for that decision was the participation of Russian troops in armed conflicts outside of the Russian Federation and outside of UN peacekeeping missions. Russian experts emphasize that IHL norms are enforced primarily at the national level, which means that Russia can make its own decisions regarding criminal prosecution for IHL violations.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Библиогр.: с. 219-225

Russia’s official position regarding the prosecution for violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in international criminal courts changed during the 1990s and the 2000s. The article studies the reasons for these changes by reviewing works of Russian experts. The performance of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) had a negative impact on Russia’s position. Russian experts questioned the impartiality of the ICTY and its effectiveness in preventing such crimes and reconciling the parties. Russia’s position has also changed with regard to the International Criminal Court (ICC). In 2000, the Russian Federation signed the Rome Statute that established the ICC, but withdrew its signature in November 2016. One of the reasons for that decision was the participation of Russian troops in armed conflicts outside of the Russian Federation and outside of UN peacekeeping missions. Russian experts emphasize that IHL norms are enforced primarily at the national level, which means that Russia can make its own decisions regarding criminal prosecution for IHL violations.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share