"Жгучий вопрос нового быта": административный запрет строительства домов-коммун в Новосибирске И. И. Атапин
Material type:
ArticleOther title: "A burning issue of new life": the ban on housescommunes in Novosibirsk [Parallel title]Subject(s): Новосибирск, город | архитектура | дома-коммуны | конструктивизм | сибирская архитектураGenre/Form: статьи в сборниках Online resources: Click here to access online
In:
Вопросы истории, археологии, политических наук и регионоведения. Вып. 14, т. 2 : сборник материалов XIV Всероссийской с международным участием научной конференции студентов, магистрантов, аспирантов и молодых ученых Томск, 25-27 апреля 2018 г. Вып. 14, т. 2. С. 308-312Abstract: В статье рассматривается эпизод из истории сибирского градостроительства, связанный с дискуссией о возведении дома-коммуны завода Сибкомбайн в Новосибирске (февраль – июнь 1930 г.). The paper examines an episode from the history of Siberian town planning. It was related
to the discussion about the construction of a house-commune for the Sibkombain
factory in Novosibirsk. The first project of this house was criticized for the lack of collectivization
and socialization of life. Another project, designed by young architects
D.M. Ageyev and G.E. Stepanchenko, suggested radical measures such as the absence
of individual kitchens and bathrooms. Local executive authorities, state-party bodies,
scientific societies, and the media supported this idea. The development of the housecommune
concept was interrupted by the resolution of the VKP(b) in May 1930 which
banned the construction of houses-communes.
Библиогр.: 9 назв.
В статье рассматривается эпизод из истории сибирского градостроительства, связанный с дискуссией о возведении дома-коммуны завода Сибкомбайн в Новосибирске (февраль – июнь 1930 г.). The paper examines an episode from the history of Siberian town planning. It was related
to the discussion about the construction of a house-commune for the Sibkombain
factory in Novosibirsk. The first project of this house was criticized for the lack of collectivization
and socialization of life. Another project, designed by young architects
D.M. Ageyev and G.E. Stepanchenko, suggested radical measures such as the absence
of individual kitchens and bathrooms. Local executive authorities, state-party bodies,
scientific societies, and the media supported this idea. The development of the housecommune
concept was interrupted by the resolution of the VKP(b) in May 1930 which
banned the construction of houses-communes.
There are no comments on this title.