E-catalog        

Библиогр.: 19 назв.

Статья посвящена выявлению и исследованию характерных особенностей наименьшей единицы диалогического текста посредством интеграции семантико- прагматического подхода. Проводится детальный лингвистический анализ когезивных отношений как между интерактивными блоками коммуникативно-прагматической структуры диалога, так и между репликами внутри интерактивного блока. Автор вводит дефиницию термина «фреквентальные цепочки» в качестве наименьшей единицы диалога. Отмечается коммуникативная преемственность составляющих когезивных отношений реплик на основе выстроенных типичных моделей. The article aims to consider linguistic features of coherence and cohesion, to identify the smallest unit of dialogue in the communicative and pragmatic structure, to make typical models of the smallest unit of dialogue. The material of the study is a French dialogic text taken from the modern writer Marc Levy’s novel The Strange Journey of Mr. Daldry. The methods employed are linguistic analysis, conversation analysis, the modular analysis of verbal interaction used in modern French linguistics, the continuous sampling method, the quantitative method. A literary dialogic text was analyzed because it represents a so-called canonical type of dialogue. At the first stage, the author introduces the definition of the term frequent chain as the smallest unit of dialogue, conducts a detailed linguistic analysis of the cohesive relations between the interactive blocks of the communicative and pragmatic structures of the dialogue. At the level of a semantic and pragmatic approach to the structure of the dialogue, frequent communication chains are formal minimal units of the dialogue, devoid of lexical content. There are significant features of cohesion between interactive units comprising a stimulus-turn and a reaction-turn expressed by speech acts. The interactive unit most often combine sequence and string-like types of turns. Frequency is recognized as private and foreign integration, as well as total presuppositions. At the second stage, within the framework of the implementation of an essential approach to the study of the structure of the dialogue, the author reveals the characteristic features of coherence between the turns within the interactive block. Implication and pragmatic coherence are recognized as frequency types. At the third stage, the author notes the communicative continuity of the components of the cohesive relations of the turns based on the architecture of the typical models. The communicative succession of the components within such a chain can be determined by a set of the most frequent indicators. Coherence inside the interactive block can be revealed by means of the implicative and pragmatic types of connection between utterances while the nonpragmatic type of connection is considered to be untypical. This could be explained by the fact that this type implies some lack of planning. The implication type of communication is often an exchange of information. The pragmatic type usually involves a second question or a counter question. Cohesion between interactive blocks is predominantly obtained by such types of connection as sequence (in the first speech block, one topic develops, in the second speech block-the another topic) and string-like arrangement (one speech block ends one topic and begins the another topic) while explication and implication are viewed as untypical in this research. As a rule, explication and implication require incoherence. The result of this research allows presuming that the succession under consideration is connected with the functional load of the literary standardized dialogue. The literary dialogue is more informative and has a more dynamic plot devised by the writer rather than the dialogue in oral communication which is characterized by its spontaneous nature and rapid change of subjects in interaction blocks.