Scientific Library of Tomsk State University

   E-catalog        

Normal view MARC view

Liability Rules in Patent Law electronic resource A Legal and Economic Analysis / by Daniel Krauspenhaar.

By: Krauspenhaar, Daniel [author.]Contributor(s): SpringerLink (Online service)Material type: TextTextSeries: Munich Studies on Innovation and CompetitionPublication details: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg : Imprint: Springer, 2015Description: XIX, 233 p. 10 illus. in color. online resourceContent type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9783642409004Subject(s): law | International law | Intellectual property -- Law and legislation | Law and Economics | Law | International IT and Media Law, Intellectual Property Law | Law and EconomicsDDC classification: 343.099 LOC classification: K4240-4343K1401-1578.25Online resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
Introductory Remarks -- Overuse of Exclusivity in Patent Law -- Private Liability Rule Regimes -- Compulsory Liability Rule and Liability Rule by Default Regimes -- Overall View and Conclusion.
In: Springer eBooksSummary: The primary purpose of a patent law system should be to enhance economic efficiency, in particular by providing incentives for making inventions. The conventional wisdom is that patents should therefore be strictly exclusive rights. Moreover, in practice patent owners are almost never forced to give up their right to exclude others and receive only a certain amount of remuneration with, for instance, compulsory licensing. Other economically interesting patent-law objectives, however, include the transfer and dissemination of knowledge. Mechanisms exist by which the patent owner decides if he or she would prefer exclusive or non-exclusive rights, for instance the  opportunity to declare the willingness to license and create patent pools. But it is questionable whether these mechanisms are sufficient and efficient enough in view of the existence of patent trolls and other problems. This work challenges the conventional wisdom to a certain extent and makes proposals for improvements.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Introductory Remarks -- Overuse of Exclusivity in Patent Law -- Private Liability Rule Regimes -- Compulsory Liability Rule and Liability Rule by Default Regimes -- Overall View and Conclusion.

The primary purpose of a patent law system should be to enhance economic efficiency, in particular by providing incentives for making inventions. The conventional wisdom is that patents should therefore be strictly exclusive rights. Moreover, in practice patent owners are almost never forced to give up their right to exclude others and receive only a certain amount of remuneration with, for instance, compulsory licensing. Other economically interesting patent-law objectives, however, include the transfer and dissemination of knowledge. Mechanisms exist by which the patent owner decides if he or she would prefer exclusive or non-exclusive rights, for instance the  opportunity to declare the willingness to license and create patent pools. But it is questionable whether these mechanisms are sufficient and efficient enough in view of the existence of patent trolls and other problems. This work challenges the conventional wisdom to a certain extent and makes proposals for improvements.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share