Scientific Library of Tomsk State University

   E-catalog        

Normal view MARC view

Developing and Maintaining Police-Researcher Partnerships to Facilitate Research Use electronic resource A Comparative Analysis / by Jeff Rojek, Peter Martin, Geoffrey P. Alpert.

By: Rojek, Jeff [author.]Contributor(s): Martin, Peter [author.] | Alpert, Geoffrey P [author.] | SpringerLink (Online service)Material type: TextTextSeries: SpringerBriefs in CriminologyPublication details: New York, NY : Springer New York : Imprint: Springer, 2015Description: XII, 84 p. 2 illus. online resourceContent type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9781493920563Subject(s): social sciences | Criminology | Economic sociology | Social Sciences | Criminology & Criminal Justice | Organizational Studies, Economic SociologyDDC classification: 364 LOC classification: HV6001-7220.5Online resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
Introduction -- Brief Review of Research Highlights -- Examples of successful and unsuccessful translation -- Final thoughts and conclusion.
In: Springer eBooksSummary: This Brief discusses methods to develop and maintain police – researcher partnerships.  First, the authors provide information that will be useful to police managers and researchers who are interested in creating and maintaining partnerships to conduct research, work together to improve policing and help others understand the linkages between the two groups.  Then, more specifically, they describe how police managers consider and utilize research in policing and criminal justice and its findings from a management perspective in both the United States and Australia.  While both countries experience similar issues of trust, acceptance, utility, and accountability between researchers and practitioners, the experiences in the countries differ.  In the United States with 17,000 agencies, the use of research findings by police agencies requires understanding, diffusion and acceptance.  In Australia with a small number of larger agencies, the problems of research-practitioner partnerships have different translational issues, including acceptance and application.  As long as police practitioners and academic researchers hold distinct and different impressions of each other, the likelihood of positive, cooperative, and sustainable agreements between them will suffer.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Introduction -- Brief Review of Research Highlights -- Examples of successful and unsuccessful translation -- Final thoughts and conclusion.

This Brief discusses methods to develop and maintain police – researcher partnerships.  First, the authors provide information that will be useful to police managers and researchers who are interested in creating and maintaining partnerships to conduct research, work together to improve policing and help others understand the linkages between the two groups.  Then, more specifically, they describe how police managers consider and utilize research in policing and criminal justice and its findings from a management perspective in both the United States and Australia.  While both countries experience similar issues of trust, acceptance, utility, and accountability between researchers and practitioners, the experiences in the countries differ.  In the United States with 17,000 agencies, the use of research findings by police agencies requires understanding, diffusion and acceptance.  In Australia with a small number of larger agencies, the problems of research-practitioner partnerships have different translational issues, including acceptance and application.  As long as police practitioners and academic researchers hold distinct and different impressions of each other, the likelihood of positive, cooperative, and sustainable agreements between them will suffer.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share