Dutch Cartesianism and the birth of philosophy of science from Regius to 's Gravesande Andrea Strazzoni.
Material type:
TextPublisher: Berlin ; Boston Walter de Gruyter GmbH, [2019]Description: 1 online resource (ix, 245 pages)ISBN: 9783110568264; 3110568268Subject(s): Descartes, René, 1596-1650 | Descartes, René, 1596-1650 | Logic | Metaphysics | Science -- Philosophy -- History | Logic | Metaphysics | Science -- Philosophy | PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / ModernGenre/Form: EBSCO eBooks Additional physical formats: Print version:: Dutch Cartesianism and the birth of philosophy of science.DDC classification: 199/.492 LOC classification: B1875 | .S88 2019ebOnline resources: Click here to access online Summary: How did the relations between philosophy and science evolve during the 17th and the 18th century? This book analyzes this issue by considering the history of Cartesianism in Dutch universities, as well as its legacy in the 18th century. It takes into account the ways in which the disciplines of logic and metaphysics became functional to the justification and reflection on the conceptual premises and the methods of natural philosophy, changing their traditional roles as art of reasoning and as science of being. This transformation took place as a result of two factors. First, logic and metaphysics (which included rational theology) were used to grant the status of indubitable knowledge of natural philosophy. Second, the debates internal to Cartesianism, as well as the emergence of alternative philosophical world-views (such as those of Hobbes, Spinoza, the experimental science and Newtonianism) progressively deprived such disciplines of their foundational function, and they started to become forms of reflection over given scientific practices, either Cartesian, experimental, or Newtonian.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
How did the relations between philosophy and science evolve during the 17th and the 18th century? This book analyzes this issue by considering the history of Cartesianism in Dutch universities, as well as its legacy in the 18th century. It takes into account the ways in which the disciplines of logic and metaphysics became functional to the justification and reflection on the conceptual premises and the methods of natural philosophy, changing their traditional roles as art of reasoning and as science of being. This transformation took place as a result of two factors. First, logic and metaphysics (which included rational theology) were used to grant the status of indubitable knowledge of natural philosophy. Second, the debates internal to Cartesianism, as well as the emergence of alternative philosophical world-views (such as those of Hobbes, Spinoza, the experimental science and Newtonianism) progressively deprived such disciplines of their foundational function, and they started to become forms of reflection over given scientific practices, either Cartesian, experimental, or Newtonian.
Print version record.
There are no comments on this title.